E’ sorprendente come twitter stia frastornando facebook. Ma forse no.
Dopo questa mia profonda riflessione, consiglio a tutti – anche a quelli che schifano i social network – di appuntarsi l’account di Giovanni (che twitter si può seguire anche senza starci dentro). Io lo seguo e lui mi onora seguendomi.
Lo voglio celebrare con questo post parafrasando il Travaglio della prefazione al libro della banda Spinoza:
“Appena leggo un tweet di Giovanni, finito di ridere mi incazzo con me stesso perché avrei voluto tweettarlo io”.
Dopodiché, quando penso a Giò, spesso mi viene in mente l’inconfondibile voz de Julio. Ma si sa, non ci deve essere sempre un motivo per tutto.
Hello. remarkable job. I did not imagine this. This is a great story. Thanks!
Publishing lay claim with all the current matter you want to assist. it’s far more complex with regards to you approach.
certainly like your web site but you have to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the reality on the other hand I will definitely come back again.
Fantastic read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on that. And he really bought me lunch because I located it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
I’m grateful that such blogs exist.
Have you thought about adding some social bookmarking buttons to these blog posts. At least for google.
It is pure perfection.
http://www1.eafit.edu.co/wikinumerico/index.php/Unsporting_Ideas_to_Get_back_your_ex_(_space_)_You%27ll_never_Bust_While_At_best_As_You_Utilize_these_On_your_Guide
I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both equally educative and engaging, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something that too few men and women are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I came across this in my search for something relating to this.
In everyday language ‘for the purpose of’ certainly can’t be replaced by ‘for a purpose of’. Is it significant legally that the statute omits words like ‘sole’ or ‘main”for the sole/main purpose of’?